Re: [JXTA discuss] Status of JxtaRuby?

On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:22 -0700, Shane Isbell wrote:
> I agree that getting a language neutral version (say using UML/OCL) of
> the JXTA API is important and helps to prevent fragmentation. 

Exactly.

> It means
> that we need to define a protocol domain rather than a typical
> business domain.
> 
> The MDA approach is itself interesting, but I am not sure that we have
> the tools to create the executables based on the model. Perhaps swig
> could help to provide a partial solution. I need to investigate.
> 

I am referring to the idea, not tools. We should be able to come out the
model and implement based on the model.

Cheers,
-- 
Henry Jen the slowhog
http://blogs.sun.com/slowhog

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBC8vjLLNaoAyBG0PURAnH/AKCGjYsEubSZGj+o//73chtA7RMB6wCeNqAQ
HjQe88dZYydqyxJsdMSET8M=
=99i0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----