RE: Peers do not find each other
"Poole, Paul P1" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jxta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthias, In my setup, I do not explicitly set any peer as a rdv, but rather after a period of about 2 minutes, one of my peers becomes and AUTO_RENDEZVOUS. I typically wait until the one peer becomes a rdv before starting up another, so I don't know what will happen if I start multiple nodes at the same time so that a rdv is not available on loadup. I suspect that one of them will become a rdv and all will work fine. I will test this scenario tomorrow and get back to you. I think if you play with your configuration, you should be able to get it working without explicitly setting a peer to rdv. You might search the list for the subject "MyJXTA configuration"... There might be something useful there for you. Hth Paul -----Original Message----- From: Matthias Horst [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [JXTA user] Peers do not find each other Hi friends, I searched a little bit more on the mailing list and found out that I really need to have a rdv service. So I added to my program an explizit call to start a rendezvous service (the code is below). But still a second peer (at the same switch) does not find the first peer. Btw. the peerGroup I pass over is the global netPeerGroup. greetings Matthias public boolean waitForRendezVous(PeerGroup peerGroup) throws Exception { RendezVousService rdv = peerGroup.getRendezVousService(); if (rdv.isRendezVous()) { return true; } if (rdv.isConnectedToRendezVous()) { return true; } //waiting for rdvs 20secs int count = 0; while (!rdv.isConnectedToRendezVous() && !rdv.isRendezVous()) { Thread.sleep(1 * 1000); if (++count >= 20) { break; } } // expl. start the rdv service rdv.startRendezVous(); // check again count = 0; while (!rdv.isConnectedToRendezVous() && !rdv.isRendezVous()) { Thread.sleep(1 * 1000); if (++count >= 5) { break; } } return rdv.isConnectedToRendezVous(); } Matthias Horst wrote: > Hi, > > Background: > ------------ > I try to connect two peers, call them peer A and peer B, which are > plugged in at the same router. I do *not* configure any rendezvous > peers, because for my projekt a want to give away just a CD with the > Peer-2-Peer Software and everybody in the same network, who uses the CD, > should find all the other users automatically, without asking a > administrator for settings. (At least that's the idea) > > Settings: > ----------- > As a special I set the rendezvous seed peers to something stupid, e.g. > tcp://127.0.0.1:19999, because if I leave this option empty, it always > tries to connect automatically to the official jxta.org rendezvous peers > what I don't want. I do *not* enable the option "use only configured > seed peers" such that it should also look for lokal rendezvous via > multicast. Btw. TCP and Multicast is enabled. All firewalls are > disabled. My program waits 20 seconds in order to find a rdvs or to > become a rdvs by itself (this is made by a piece of code Muhamed > committed to the mailing list ...) > > Experiment: > ------------ > With these settings peer A and peer B don't find each other. Moreover > the program does not say that it has become a rdvs by itself. > > Now I configure peer A as a rendezvous and restart it without > restarting > peer B (the edge peer). > > Again they don't find each other. > > Now I restart peer B (the edge peer). > > Again they don't find each other. > > Now I configure peer B to use peer A as a rendezvous (seed rendezvous) > and restart it without restarting peer A. > > Now everything works fine! > > Then I stop peer A (the rendezvous) and restart it. > > Again they don't find each other. > > Question: > ------------ > Is anybody out there who can explain this behaviour? I thought that at > least in the same subnet all peers find each other automatically as long > as multicast is enabled even without an explicit rdv peer. Obviously as > soon as peer A is offline for some seconds every communication between A > and B seems to be impossible. I don't think that you guys out there are > using a p2p network where everybody must reboot his application because > somebody else shutdown his peer ;) So what's the trick? > > > > greetings > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] -- ================================================================ best regards Genius Bytes Software Solutions GmbH Matthias Horst Dipl. Math. Konrad-Zuse-Str. 16 CTO 44801 Bochum e-mail: [email protected] fon: +49 234 9708 492 web : http://www.geniusbytes.com fax: +49 234 9708 497 ================================================================ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]