Re: Sockets and Groups

Vanessa, first of all, thank you for your answer.

You are right, I created the group advertisement
(advPG) from the all purpose peer group implementation
 .

So, do you recomend to use another way to create the
advPG? I used that one because it's the one I have
seen  in the examples.





 --- Vanessa Williams <[email protected]> escribió:

> Sorry Eugenio, maybe I wasn't clear. I meant, what
> is the membership  
> service being used by the group? If  you created the
> group  
> advertisement (advPG) from the all purpose peer
> group implementation  
> advertisement, then I think it has a null membership
> service by  
> default. (Perhaps you could send the peer group
> advertisement so we  
> can see for sure.) I'm guessing that's why the peers
> can communicate  
> without having to "join" the group explicitly. Maybe
> someone else  
> knows for sure...
> 
> Vanessa
> 
> On 20-Feb-06, at 3:36 PM, Eugenio Flores wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Well, I don't use any membership service. In both
> application use  
> > the same group advertisement to instantiate a peer
> object in order  
> > to use it as a parameter when I declare, both,
> JxtaServerSocket and  
> > the JxtaSocket.
> >
> > Like this:
> > //Server socket side//////////////////////////
> >
> > pg = myGroup.newGroup(advPG);
> > serverSocket = new JxtaServerSocket(pg,
> this.pipeAdv,10);
> >
> > //JxtaSocket
> side////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >  socket = new JxtaSocket(pg,
> >                                 //no specific
> peerid
> >                                 null,
> >                                 pipeAdv,
> >                                 //general TO: 30
> seconds
> >                                 30000,
> >                                 // reliable
> connection
> >                                 true);
> >
> >
> > Vanessa Williams <[email protected]> escribió:
> > Hi Eugenio,
> >
> > interesting situation. Does the group you created
> have a null  
> > membership service? In other words, maybe everyone
> is automatically  
> > authorized for the group without having to log in?
> It's just a  
> > thought...
> >
> > Vanessa
> >
> > On 20-Feb-06, at 1:51 PM, Eugenio Flores wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Group.
> >>
> >> I got a conceptual doubt about joining groups and
> JXTASockets:
> >>
> >> I have two applications (You know that already),
> the first one has  
> >> a JxtaServerSocket, but first it creates a group.
> Then I declare  
> >> the JxtaServerSocket in the scope of this group,
> instead of doing  
> >> it in the scope of the netGroup:
> >>
> >> myGroup = PeerGroupFactory.newNetPeerGroup();
> >> private PeerGroup pg = null;
> >> private PeerGroupAdvertisement advPG = null;//I
> assign advPG when  
> >> I look for the group advertisement locally
> >> JxtaServerSocket serverSocket;
> >> pg = myGroup.newGroup(advPG);
> >> serverSocket = new JxtaServerSocket(pg,
> this.pipeAdv,10);
> >>
> >> The other application has a JxtaSocket, but first
> it finds the  
> >> group advertisement published by t he first
> application, afterward  
> >> it instantiates that group. Finally I create the
> JxtaSocket in the  
> >> scope of this group.
> >>
> >>  socket = new JxtaSocket(pg,
> >>                                 //no specific
> peerid
> >>                                 null,
> >>                                 pipeAdv,
> >>                                 //general TO: 30
> seconds
> >>                                 30000,
> >>                                 // reliable
> connection
> >>                                 true);
> >>
> >> Bo th application work fine, they communicate
> with each other  
> >> well, but the second application did not have to
> join the group  
> >> created in the JXTAServer application. As I told
> you, I just  
> >> instantiate! , in the second application, the
> group that it finds  
> >> and creates the JxtaSocket with this group. So
> now I wonder in  
> >> what kind of cases it is necessary to join a
> group.
> >>
> >> Could you help me with this doubt?
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot again.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB
> extra a tu  
> >> correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
> >
> > --
> > Vanessa Williams
> > Oponia Networks
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB
> extra a tu correo  
> > por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
> 
> --
> Vanessa Williams
> Oponia Networks
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Do You Yahoo!? 
La mejor conexión a Internet y <b >2GB</b> extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx