Re: Vision: JXTA Application Server for configuration & deployment

I agree that should be an additional, upper level abstraction build on
top of existing platform. However, I would expect that some aspects of
current Jxta implementation, as configuration, might require some
adaptation. Here compatibility will be the main issue.

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 23:31 -0700, tra wrote:
> John Dickerson wrote:
> 
> > (iii) JXTA application servers make JXTA P2P a more serious proposition to the corporate world and consequently encourage JXTA's popularity as a serious alternative to .NET and J2EE for certain application types.
> > 
> > I am very excited by the JXTA Application Server vision as I believe it can make JXTA easier to use and will also bring JXTA into the mainstream alongside J2EE and .NET.
> > 
> > Thank you all for your attention.
> > 
> > Any criticisms or points of agreement you have with the JXTA application server vision wil be much appreciated.
> Your comments makes a lot of sense, and there are nothing to my knowledge in the 
> core platform that will preclude us from building such container abstraction. At 
> the same time, we should not assume the only way to deploy JXTA is through a 
> servlet container.
> 
> Hth,
> 
> B.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > John Dickerson
> > 
> 
> 
-- 
========================================================================
 0 0 0  Pablo Chacin               | Dept. d'Arquitectura de Computadors
 0 0 0  e-mail: [email protected] | UPC-Campus Nord. Modul C6, 002
 0 0 0  phone: +34 +93 401 1055    | Jordi Girona, 1-3            
 U P C  fax:   +34 +93 401 7055    | 08034 Barcelona - SPAIN     
        www:   http://personals.ac.upc.es/pchacin
========================================================================