Re: Unit test question...
Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.keel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1111925296.13890.11.camel@popper> |
Salut all,
ok, I got a bit further... I'm getting the idea behind the whole
keel:uberjar and keel:test stuff. My problem now is that if I want to
run my tests they are completely ignored and the classes are missing in
target/test-classes (which seems to be the place where they should be?).
I tried to compare my tests with those which are included (e. g. the
SuperString test from keel-common). The only diff I see is that my tests
are derived from AbstractKeelServiceTest and the others are only simple
junit tests (derived from TestCase).
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Aleks
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:14 +0100, Aleksandar Vidakovic wrote:
> Salut all,
>
> I have a problem writing a unit test for a service. In Eclipse
> everything seems to be OK (dependencies etc.), but when I run the test
> on the command line ("keel:tests") it fails with the following
> exception:
>
> [code]
>
> java.lang.Error: Unresolved compilation problems: The method
> setNested(Throwable) from the type NestedException is not visible The
> method getStackTraceAsString(Throwable) from the type NestedException is
> not visible at
> org.keel.core.container.ServerSideNestedException.setNested(ServerSideNestedException.java:107) at org.keel.core.exception.NestedException.<init>(NestedException.java:86) at org.keel.core.container.ServerSideNestedException.<init>(ServerSideNestedException.java:103) at org.keel.core.container.ContainerException.<init>(ContainerException.java:16) at org.keel.core.container.ContainerFactoryLoader.getContainerFactory(ContainerFactoryLoader.java:40) at org.keel.core.container.ContainerFactoryLoader.getContainerFactory(ContainerFactoryLoader.java:57) at org.keel.util.test.AbstractKeelTest.setUp(AbstractKeelTest.java:67)
>
> [/code]
>
> And to be honest: I have problems to find
> org.keel.util.test.AbstractKeelTest in the current codebase... does this
> mean that there is now another way to write the unit tests?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aleks
>
>
> http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml
> Keelgroup mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com
>
--
Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]>
http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml
Keelgroup mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com