RE: DefaultQuery...
"Jason Williams" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.keel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D2FCD0CAD215474BB682B90A06537E27AB28FF@corpmail02.corp.walmart.com> |
That will work for me. thanks. ~jason -----Original Message----- From: keelgroup-keelframework.com-admin-rI8AND0JKYOgdSakss0wQjGcDxdMUgRv@public.gmane.org [mailto:keelgroup-keelframework.com-admin-rI8AND0JKYOgdSakss0wQjGcDxdMUgRv@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Vidakovic Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:14 AM To: Keel Developers Subject: RE: [Keelgroup] DefaultQuery... My suggestion was to keep this method as the only one required by the Query interface. I wouldn't eleminate the other methods immediately... I'd set them only to deprecated. But I think Query.getQueryResults() is the most (only) used method... Does this break anything for you? Cheers, Aleks On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 14:02 -0700, Jason Williams wrote: > Lou just brought this to my attention. We use > QueryService.getQueryResults() quite a bit. I'm not sure how this > factors into a decision as to keep the code or not but we use it. > > ~jason > > -----Original Message----- > From: keelgroup-keelframework.com-admin-rI8AND0JKYOgdSakss0wQjGcDxdMUgRv@public.gmane.org > [mailto:keelgroup-keelframework.com-admin-rI8AND0JKYOgdSakss0wQjGcDxdMUgRv@public.gmane.org] On > Behalf Of Pete Carapetyan > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 6:40 AM > To: keelgroup-keelframework.com-rI8AND0JKYOgdSakss0wQjGcDxdMUgRv@public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: [Keelgroup] DefaultQuery... > > > Salut all, > > > > just wanted to know two things: > > > > - is there really a need for the methods > > "QueryService.getQueryResults(ObjectKey)" and > > "QueryService.getQueryResults(SortedSet)" > > - would it be painfull for anybody to delete these methods? > > I too would be interested in who is using the query service, as I found > stuff in there that does not even appear to be working and had to be > ignored as API. > > > > > As I understand it, all you can do with them could be done in the SQL > > query, too. And I think that the corresponding code is broken > anyway... > > > > In exchange I have to offer some new features (criteria > replacement)... > > surprise ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Aleks > > http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml > > Keelgroup mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com > > > > http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml > Keelgroup mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com > http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml > Keelgroup mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com > -- Aleksandar Vidakovic <[email protected]> http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml Keelgroup mailing list [email protected] http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml Keelgroup mailing list [email protected] http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com