Re: Keel Entity Beans?
"Michael Nash JGlobal.com" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.keel.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | JGlobal |
| Message-ID | <20040324094105.472174d1@jglobal> |
Steve: In Keel, the Persistence layer uses ordinary JavaBeans as the objects stored/retrieved from the database (actually, for the default persistence layer you don't actually even need a bean class, you can use what is essentially a "dynabean" equivilant, but the Javabean is recommended, as all of the other implementations of persistence require it, including Hibernate). Much like Hibernate, the "entity bean" we talk about is not in fact an EJB-style entity bean at all, it's a much lighter-weight object. So, the short answer to your question is that they don't compare at all with EJB/J2EE entity beans, although they fulfill the same function. HTH! Mike On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:13:32 -0800 "Steve Harris" <[email protected]> wrote: > Most J2EE people I talk to describe entity beans as > the spawn of the devil. I was wondering how keel entity beans > compare to j2ee entity beans and whether people use them or whether > they are mostly not well liked like j2ee entity beans? > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > User mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.keelframework.org/listinfo.cgi/user-keelframework.org -- Michael Nash JGlobal Ltd Next-Generation Web Application Development and Open Source Support http://www.jglobal.com Bahamas Commerce and Trade Offshore eCommerce Hosting and Business Services http://www.bahamascommerce.com