Re: Exposing my models as webservices
Nathan Kontny <Nathan.Kontny-UgwZ4owrJFB8UrSeD/[email protected]> Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:07:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.keel.devel,gmane.comp.java.keel.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is there an easier way to deploy my app as both fronted by clnt-struts(comm-internal) and clnt-axis? It seems for this configuration I would have to change a couple ant.properties settings in between builds like webapp.name (one for the struts webapp, and one for the axis one). Quoting "Michael Nash JGlobal.com" <[email protected]>: > Nate: > > > Well, I was really attracted to Keel because I knew this type of situation > was > > going to come up for my application: I need to expose the entire > application as > > a set of webservices (this is because the client now longer wants a > jsp/struts > > front end, but one in Flash. And I think the Flash GUI calling > webservices > > might be the niftiest solution.). So hopefully my expectations worked > > out...but I have a couple questions. > > I'd be happy to try to assist... > > > How may I ask have people done this? From just a quick glance at > clnt-axis, it > > looks like Keel basically just exposes a generic webservice and it expects > a > > model name plus whatever params the model is going to need. > > I've done it on 2 projects so far, and yes, you're quite right, it's a > generic webservice - just like all the other client models. > > > So you had to > > hand-roll your WSDL file to describe what those parameters are (can't use > > Java2WSDL of course). But isn't that a pretty messy service description > for > > that one webservice if you want to expose a bunch of models. There would > be > > lots of optional elements in there that only get used depending on which > model > > was specified. > > But that's the whole idea of the Model service - to have a single interface > to different UIs. The UI level is where you can specialize - e.g. in one of > the projects I did with Axis, it was JSP on the front-end, using clnt-struts > and comm-axis to talk to a server running clnt-axis. The JSP's looked > *exactly* like the JSP's you'd use in a single-vm Keel project. So did the > models, and the system.xconf - the only thing different was the fact that we > were using Axis as the transport. In the situation for Flash, I can't say > exactly how it would be done, but if you can parrallel clnt-xxx, the same > thing should be possible there, with no need for a specialized WSDL for each > model. > > > Maybe I could break it out in the wsdl file by naming each model as a > different > > service, but then the client still has to make sure they call the service > with > > the model name. > > > > An alternative I am thinking about is creating a Java class as a proxy to > each > > model that I want to expose as a service (or group them in the proxy), and > then > > deploy the proxies with traditional Axis tools like Java2WSDL. > > Quite possible, and probably, as you say, "automatable" - e.g. you could > generate the beans, or even use DynaBeans (like we do in clnt-struts). > > Let me know how it goes and if I can help out at all! > > Regards, > > Mike > > Thank you so much in advance. > > -Nate > > http://keelframework.org/documentation > > Keelgroup mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com > > > -- > Michael Nash > > JGlobal Ltd > Next-Generation Web Application Development and Open Source Support > http://www.jglobal.com > > Bahamas Commerce and Trade > Offshore eCommerce Hosting and Business Services > http://www.bahamascommerce.com > > http://keelframework.org/documentation Keelgroup mailing list [email protected] http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com