Re: Licensing questions
Marc St-Jean <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:32:32 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.linux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 7, 2005, at 6:15 PM, Calvin Austin wrote: > Lots of difficult questions here. Joining the blackdown porting project > means you use the blackdown binary license etc. I think joining the Blackdown project would be best for us in order to get a more recent and stable base and to be able to contribute the code for the CPU which is currently not supported. BTW, I went to verify how the "blackdown binary license" would be different from the Sun license with regards to distribution with a distro. However after downloading twice from the ftp.tux.org mirror the LICENSE file at the root of the 1.4.2-01 directory appears to be corrupt. In the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERNS sub-section B. is truncated at "... agree to defe". Sub-section C. has a (v) clause with no text. Sub-section E. is truncated at "... reproduced in its enti". Could someone please verify this file? > If you want to talk to someone at Sun let me know and I'll forward your > questions on Thanks, Calvin I will take you up on that offer. My first question is whether we need a separate commercial license to distribute the JRE and JDK with our distro? If so what is the fee schedule for the license? Thanks, Marc > Marc St-Jean wrote: > >> On Jan 7, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Dominic Duval wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hey Marc, >>> >>> Note, however, that the information contained in this email >>> summarizes >>> my own interpretation of Sun and Blackdown access rules to the Java >>> VM >>> source tree and should not be considered legal advice, nor be viewed >>> as >>> official answers from Blackdown, my employer, or myself. >>> >>> >> >> Thanks Dominic, I understand and appreciate your interpretation. >> >> >> >> >>>> We want to port Blackdown to a Linux distribution running on a CPU >>>> not >>>> currently supported. Reading the information on the Blackdown and >>>> Sun >>>> web sites leaves me with some questions with regards to distributing >>>> our build which would be derived from both Sun's source and >>>> Blackdown's >>>> patches. >>>> >>>> >>> Just our of curiosity, what's that CPU? >>> >>> >> >> Sorry I can't answer that yet, I don't have permission from our >> customer. >> >> >> >> >>>> My main questions are... >>>> >>>> 1. Does applying the Blackdown patches change any of the licensing >>>> requirements. In other words does it add any restrictions to the Sun >>>> licensing requirements compared to only using the Sun sources? >>>> >>>> >>> Here's how it works: Blackdown has its own CVS where sources are >>> stored. >>> In order to get access to that CVS you need to 1) Contact the CVS >>> maintainers 2) Have them provide you the contract, which is really >>> between you and Sun Microsystems >>> >>> >> >> This sounds great but without getting any replies from the contacts on >> the web site it is difficult! >> I understood that some Linux distros (RedHat?) were distributing the >> Blackdown JRE so there must be one live contact email where they were >> able to verify licensing. >> >> >> >> >>> Moreover, the Sun Community License is already restricted enough. You >>> can't really use it for a product you'll distribute. >>> >>> >> >> Yes, but I'm trying to find out if there are any additional >> restrictions. For instance, from my understanding of the Sun >> information, you can distribute the JRE (once it has passed the JCK >> and >> been evaluated by Sun). However, if I've based my JRE on Blackdown >> patches in addition to Sun sources does it change anything? >> >> >> >> >>>> 2. Are the Blackdown patches to the JRE available for download? >>>> >>>> >>> Not that I know of. The contract between Blackdown developpers and >>> Sun >>> Microsystems allows us to distribute patches, but we need to be >>> *really* >>> careful not to provide too much stuff in the patch. That might >>> explain >>> why you won't find any Blackdown patch on the Internet. I know I >>> wouldn't take the risk to distribute one :) >>> >>> On the other hand, the way I understand it, the source tree you'll >>> get >>> access to from Sun is way different from the one we use for the >>> Blackdown project. So a Blackdown patch might now apply cleanly on >>> the >>> Sun source tree. Not sure about it though, as I have never downloaded >>> sources directly from sun. >>> >>> >> >> That is interesting, I'm not sure it is clear to me. You state "The >> contract between Blackdown developpers and Sun Microsystems allows us >> to distribute patches". If the patches aren't against the Sun source >> (obtained through the SCSL) then how can they be of use to people >> recompiling/porting to their distros? >> >> >> >> >>>> 3. Are the Blackdown patches to the JDK available for download? >>>> >>>> >>> See previous answer. >>> >>> >>> >>>> 4. If the answer to questions 3 and/or 4 is no, is it available if >>>> we >>>> fax proof that we are licensed. And if so to both the JRE and SDK >>>> patches? >>>> >>>> >>> No idea. I don't have control over the cvs and/or the registration >>> process. Karl Asha does. >>> >>> >> >> Karl was the first contact I tried two months ago but no reply. I'll >> send you a private email if you don't mind verifying have the right >> address. Some the pages on the site may have an old address. >> >> >> >>> In my opinion doing this will be difficult. >>> >>> -Dominic >>> >>> >> >> I understand but if we have Sun verify that we are licensed under the >> SCSL is then possible to access the patches? >> >> Thanks Dominic, >> Marc >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] >> >> >> > > -- > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]