License Wave
Michael Finney <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Surfing the license wave. I need help. I read http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net/luxorfaq.html and also looked at the archives for license information. http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=2491622 BTW, I am not sure what the endowment fund does for you, Gerald. 1) a) Are you the Luxor Foundation? b) You live off of the endowment? c) You get money? Yes, I am a little confused. ;) More importantly: As you may recall, I did the tutorial at the luxor-contrib website and saw the huge number of jars / projects that Luxor XUL relies on. Since Luxor XUL is GPL, I assume all the things Luxor depends on are GPL or less restrictive. 2) Right? (Correct me if I am wrong, but...) Emacs is a GPL tool which can be used by anyone to edit a file. Even if I am making software for my job and using emacs to make the files, the GPL license does not apply. The reason GPL does not apply is because I am not making derived works; I am just using the editor. Even though the editor is making the files, the editor does not need to be deployed with the files. Therefore, those files are not GPL. (That reasoning may not hold water..... hmmm) 3) Right? 4) I need a book to help me navigate this open source license stuff. Yes, I have read and lost a lot of time reading the licenses myself via browser. However, I need examples. I am fighting the urge to just turn up my nose at all Open Source stuff due to the license complexity. I actually know some people who will not even consider ANY open source code because they are afraid of getting in license trouble at work. However, I get the feeling that when I "get it" the effort will be worth it. Personal balance between commercial and open source will have been achieved. 5) *FAQ Worthy if refactored?* Does Luxor XUL fall into the category of just using the product and thus the final result is not GPL? If I am using Luxor XUL to make GUI stuff, the GUI stuff it produces does not fall under GPL. Basically, I can make an application and tie in my logic into the Luxor XUL GUI stuff. Ah.... However, to deploy I need the Luxor XUL stuff and all the jars it depends on don't I? Therefore, the whole application would have to be GPL and that would not be acceptable to my company. Am I right? 6) If I contribute to Luxor XUL, and get a "commercial license" can I do whatever I want with the code? Can I even re-release it to the general public under an MIT or BSD license? I bet the license would say something like "agree to not release the source code". Correct? Can I see an example of what a commercial license would look like? I really could see a use in using this product at work someday, maybe, perhaps.. It depends. I would have to learn more about it; try it out more. 7) What if a person works on the XUL project and there is a dispute as to how much a person needs to have worked in order to get a commercial license? How can we squish that concern so that people will contribute? Thanks, Michael Finney Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform Sun Certified Developer for the Java 2 Platform Sun Certified Web Component Developer for J2EE Platform Co-founder of PPJDG - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppjdg ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com