Re: License Wave

Michael Finney <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you for your quick response.

Yes, I have read material at http://www.opensource.org/ and 
http://www.fsf.org

The truth is that if a person is not sure whether or not he/she would 
be in violation of the GNU GPL license, they he/she won't use the code 
at all.

I have read the GNU license stuff more than once.

Let's examine the http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net/license.html 
together:

If I use Luxor XUL, I am creating a "work based on the Program".  Thus, 
the whole application would have to be GNU.  So, I guess the license is 
clear.

I should check out  http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/   
(specifically http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/licensing.html?cid=4 
  ) ?   I wanted to make sure the URL is correct.

Thanks,
Michael



On Sunday, April 13, 2003, at 03:32 PM, Gerald Bauer wrote:

> Servus Michael,
>
>   First, if you don't like the GNU GPL or if you have
> doubts that you're in violation you can always buy a
> classic commercial license.
>
>   Luxor follows Trolltech's Qt's licensing model. So
> please, check their website for details how it all
> works.
> <clipped>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger 
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and 
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX 
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.