Re: License Wave
Michael Finney <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your quick response. Yes, I have read material at http://www.opensource.org/ and http://www.fsf.org The truth is that if a person is not sure whether or not he/she would be in violation of the GNU GPL license, they he/she won't use the code at all. I have read the GNU license stuff more than once. Let's examine the http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net/license.html together: If I use Luxor XUL, I am creating a "work based on the Program". Thus, the whole application would have to be GNU. So, I guess the license is clear. I should check out http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/ (specifically http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt/licensing.html?cid=4 ) ? I wanted to make sure the URL is correct. Thanks, Michael On Sunday, April 13, 2003, at 03:32 PM, Gerald Bauer wrote: > Servus Michael, > > First, if you don't like the GNU GPL or if you have > doubts that you're in violation you can always buy a > classic commercial license. > > Luxor follows Trolltech's Qt's licensing model. So > please, check their website for details how it all > works. > <clipped> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com