Re: License Wave
Michael Finney <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, licensing is becoming too complex. Can the person serving client A be put into a binding legal agreement where the person is only allowed to distribute to A and still keep GNU GPL? Thus, the person making the code for A is not allowed to sell the code to B. I would think so. Michael On Monday, April 14, 2003, at 10:10 AM, denis cardon wrote: > Hi Michael, > >>> If we have the following: >>> o GPL code (which I hypothetically created or >> put together through >>> other GPL code) >>> o client A >>> o client A's competitor B >>> <clipped> >>> However, B could ask for a price quote to either you > or client A for that particular piece of code (note: > price quote may be equal to 0). But since you should > definitly be better at IT consulting than client A > (otherwise A wouldn't need you), B should definitly go > toward you ;-) > > Moreover, I think licencing is becoming too complex. > Sticking to GPL is easier and is less costly (we don't > have enough money to waste for paying licence lawyer > fees). > > Cheers, > > Denis ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf