Re: License Wave

Michael Finney <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, licensing is becoming too complex.

Can the person serving client A be put into a binding legal agreement 
where the person is only allowed to distribute to A and still keep GNU 
GPL?  Thus, the person making the code for A is not allowed to sell the 
code to B.  I would think so.


Michael


On Monday, April 14, 2003, at 10:10 AM, denis cardon wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
>>> If we have the following:
>>>    o GPL code (which I hypothetically created or
>> put together through
>>> other GPL code)
>>>    o client A
>>>    o client A's competitor B
>>> <clipped>

>>> However, B could ask for a price quote to either you
> or client A for that particular piece of code (note:
> price quote may be equal to 0). But since you should
> definitly be better at IT consulting than client A
> (otherwise A wouldn't need you), B should definitly go
> toward you ;-)
>
> Moreover, I think licencing is becoming too complex.
> Sticking to GPL is easier and is less costly (we don't
> have enough money to waste for paying licence lawyer
> fees).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Denis



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.