RE: Poll: What license do you prefer for the Luxor XUL toolkit?

Why are you intending to change them?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Gerald
> Bauer
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:10 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [luxor-xul-user] Poll: What license do you prefer for the Luxor
> XUL toolkit?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
>   I plan to switch the license for the Luxor XUL
> toolkit and all its libraries such as Apollo, Caramel,
> Cypress, Rachel, Salsa and so on.
> 
>   If you support the change I invite you to cast your
> vote in the Memphis Sun online poll asking "What
> license do you prefer for the Luxor XUL toolkit?"
> 
>   The license line-up includes:
> 
> * GNU General Public License (GPL)
> * GNU General Public License (GPL)+Link Clause
> * GNU Lesser/Library General Public License (LGPL)
> * Apache-Style License
> * Eclipse-Style Common Public License (CPL)
> * Mozilla-Style Public License (MPL)
> * Sun-Style Look-Don't-Touch License
> * "Classic" Commercial License
> * Other (Please Add Comments Below)
> 
>    
>    You can find the the online pollstation @
> http://luxor-xul.sourceforge.net/sun/2004/02/poll_what_license_do_
you_prefer_for_the_luxor_xul_toolkit.html

   - Gerald


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
luxor-xul-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxor-xul-user



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn