Re: [Fwd: Flash]
Vic Cekvenich <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:13:38 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.mvc.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040404040200010904050802 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The only thing that handles back button well is ... flash imo: http://www.robertpenner.com/experiments/backbutton/backbutton_code.html Broadband is comming!!!! And people want rich UI. My clients "think" that clide side is faster (for example client side Java applets they think are faster); but the point it MTV.com, and cocacola.com, etc.... people want RICH UI!!!! So I am working or mastering flash to xml-rpc runing formbeans/dao inside of pico. Most flash 'developers' have 6 months..... some J2EE developers have 6 years or more. So development experience couts a lot .V Matt Raible wrote: > The flash stuff is cool, but I do have a couple of problems with Flash: > > 1. It's slow - or rather it just "seems" slow because it says "please > wait" vs. me waiting for an actual page to load - which I'm used to. > > 2. Refresh and back buttons on the browser cause everything to start > at the beginning (at least in the foot joy site). > > If they could fix #2, Flash would be *much* better IMO for web > applications. I've been a flash fan for years (unlike many other > folks) - but it is very hard to find good flash developers vs. good > HTML developers. > > My $0.02, > > Matt > > On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 06:39 AM, Vic Cekvenich wrote: > > > > Vic Cekvenich wrote: > > > > > A new version of display tag: > > http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html#1.0-b1. > > > And FYI bellow: > > > > Macromedia, Inc. > > > <image.tiff> > <image.tiff> > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > > > > > <mime-attachment><mime-attachment><mime-attachment><mime-attachment> > > --------------040404040200010904050802 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> The only thing that handles back button well is ... flash imo:<br> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.robertpenner.com/experiments/backbutton/backbutton_code.html">http://www.robertpenner.com/experiments/backbutton/backbutton_code.html</a><br> <br> Broadband is comming!!!! And people want rich UI. My clients "think" that clide side is faster (for example client side Java applets they think are faster); but the point it MTV.com, and cocacola.com, etc.... people want RICH UI!!!!<br> <br> So I am working or mastering flash to xml-rpc runing formbeans/dao inside of pico. <br> Most flash 'developers' have 6 months..... some J2EE developers have 6 years or more. So development experience couts a lot<br> .V<br> <br> <br> <br> Matt Raible wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="[email protected]">The flash stuff is cool, but I do have a couple of problems with Flash: <br> <br> 1. It's slow - or rather it just "seems" slow because it says "please wait" vs. me waiting for an actual page to load - which I'm used to. <br> <br> 2. Refresh and back buttons on the browser cause everything to start at the beginning (at least in the foot joy site). <br> <br> If they could fix #2, Flash would be *much* better IMO for web applications. I've been a flash fan for years (unlike many other folks) - but it is very hard to find good flash developers vs. good HTML developers. <br> <br> My $0.02, <br> <br> Matt <br> <br> On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 06:39 AM, Vic Cekvenich wrote: <br> <br> <blockquote><br> <br> <!-- 0000,0000,0000 -->Vic Cekvenich wrote: <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> A new version of display tag: <br> <br> <tt><u><!-- 1999,1999,FFFF --><font size="+1"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html#1.0-b1">http://displaytag.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html#1.0-b1</a></font></u><!-- 0000,0000,0000 --><font size="+1">.</font></tt><!-- 0000,0000,0000 --> <br> <br> <br> And FYI bellow: <br> <br> <br> <br> Macromedia, Inc. <br> <br> <br> </blockquote> <image.tiff> <br> <center><image.tiff> <br> <blockquote><!-- 0000,0000,0000 --><br> </blockquote> </center> <blockquote><!-- 0000,0000,0000 --><br> </blockquote> <center><image.tiff> <br> <blockquote><!-- 0000,0000,0000 --><br> </blockquote> </center> <blockquote><!-- 0000,0000,0000 --><br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <mime-attachment><mime-attachment><mime-attachment><mime-attachment></blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </body> </html> --------------040404040200010904050802--