Re: Preparing for 2.0 beta 1

I will try to get to my tests by the week's end.

I like Tomcat style separate binary and source distributions.

The tools should be separate from the core.

The JMX and implementation code should be in separate JAR files. Doing 
this is important for J2EE implementers.

... WkH




"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
11/10/2003 12:10 PM

To
<[email protected]>
cc

Subject
[Mx4j-devel] Preparing for 2.0 beta 1








Hi all,

I have worked out build.xml to make sure the target 'release' works fine 
with all changes that have been made since last release (more than 1 year 
ago !).

I have reduced the number of test failures down to < 10 (of more than 1200 
tests), I feel we can go for beta 1 in few days and then fine-tune the 
release.

I need:

1) From Ward, the status of his tests
2) From Norm, the status of the new web site
3) A volunteer that chases down the I18NStandardMBean bug, if Martin 
Fuzzey does not follow up on this
4) Opinions on how the distribution should look like: 
We need to ship sources separated from binary or everything together ? 
MX4J tools separated from core JMX implementation ?
JMX classes jar separated from implementation jar ?
What is the best way to build MX4J from the distribution ? Follow e.g. 
Tomcat's source distribution style ?

Many thanks

Simon