RE: Re: Mx4j-devel digest, Vol 1 #385 - 12 msgs

Simon,

Ok its fixed now.

In fact it was a bug in the test case rather than the code itself.

A while back I improved the code to allow descriptions to be inherited from 
superclasses and forgot to update the test case - oops!!

Martin

At 10:16 12/11/2003 +0100, Bordet, Simone wrote:
>Hi Martin !
>
> > Simon et al,
> >
> > I'm still around (a little in lurker mode its true).
> >
> > What's up with I18NStandardMBean? I don't see anything on the
> > SF bug tracker.
> >
> > If you tell me what the problem is I'll fix it - you guys
> > have got more
> > than enough to do with all the rest :)
>
>There is a test failing (see here: 
>http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/test/1.4.2/index.html) and I don't know why; 
>since the test code seems fine to me, I guess it's a bug...
>
>If you can take a look, will be great !
>
>Thanks !
>
>Simon





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/