[ mx4j-Feature Requests-851584 ] Support for "jmx.invoke.getters" property
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Feature Requests item #851584, was opened at 2003-11-30 16:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by emcmanus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=450650&aid=851584&group_id=47745 Category: JMX Implementation Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 1 Submitted By: Simone Bordet (biorn_steedom) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support for "jmx.invoke.getters" property Initial Comment: This property has been added in JMX 1.2, but MX4J never supported invoking getters and setters via MBeanServer.invoke(). Low priority for now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eamonn McManus (emcmanus) Date: 2003-12-03 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=770046 This item is poorly described in the JMX 1.2 specification. First of all, it is in the wrong place (in the section on Dynamic MBeans, instead of the section on Standard MBeans where it belongs). Secondly, it was intended to ease the transition to a strict no-invoking-getters model for people who had unwisely relied on the fact that the RI did previously allow you to invoke getters and setters. It should not have been included in the specification, but rather in release notes for the RI - it is not intended that every implementation be required to understand this property. I would recommend that MX4J not include this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=450650&aid=851584&group_id=47745 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey. Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate. http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8