RE: Last bugs coordination and finally 2.0 !

Hi,

I'm using your http adaptor and I like it cos it's lightweight and
not too hard to modify.

Having it backed by a standard J2EE web container like jetty or tomcat is
cool for sure ( more standard, easier to modify ) but it will become
really heavy.

I don't see myself ship a tool using your http console with a 10mb+ web
container just to have this functionality.

Regards

SuperBonBon

> Hi Carlos,
>
>> Are you talking about making a container version of the Http
>> Adaptor. I've been a bit away form the list so I'm kind of
>> loosing track :-)
>
> Yesterday I tried to run a simple JSP that made use of JSR 160 API by
> starting Jetty from within a running MBeanServer.
> 10 lines of code, it is really that simple.
>
> Given that, I'd like to start a discussion on the future of the HTTP
> console, since having it backed by a full compliant J2EE web container is
> definitely cool IMHO.
>
> Later this week.
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Mx4j-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mx4j-devel
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click