RE: adding mx4j's connector class to factory list

Hi,

> > BTW, I could not find the RJMX classes in Tomcat 5...
> > Where are they ? I am trying to run your example to see 
> what it does not work.
> 
> $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib.  It could very well depend on the 
> sub-version
> of Tomcat.  I know that they have been moving logging libraries around
> due to classloader conflicts.

Well, I could find there only the JMXRI's JMX classes (javax.management.*) but not remote's (javax.management.remote.*) RJMXRI's.

Maybe I'm confused, let's try to recap.

You're running a HTTP connector you wrote that uses a JMXConnector to connect to a JMXConnectorServer that lives in JVM2.
You've packaged MBeans on the servlet container (outside WEB-INF), are their classes also present in JVM2 ? Note that on JVM1 you just need the class names of the MBeans (it can be a management method of a remote MBean that returns you this information).
You have mx4j.jar and mx4j-remote.jar in WEB-INF/lib.
You have the rmiregistry running.

The goal is to allow a user to register/unregister/interact with MBeans from HTML to JVM2. JVM1 will only act as a bridge.

With this configuration, Tomcat's JMX classes should not be involved at all.

> Thx for looking.
> 
> If you're not running that for self-education

Well, yes, I would like to see if there is any problem with T5. With T4 no issues at all, and I am hoping would be the case for T5 as well.

Thanks

Simon


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click