RE: [Mx4j-user] Using M-Let Service with MX4J

Hi, 

> >Yes, this is a "bug".
> >Frankly the MLet file format is very far from XML, which is a kind of
> >standard for config files, however...
> >Please file a bug in SourceForge about this.
> >  
> >
> 
> Finally I'm not sure that this is a "bug". Maybe the specification is
> not clear enough as I saw a lot of m-let file examples having all the
> elements values double-quoted.

File the bug anyway, so we will keep track of it for full interoperability with JMXRI.

> Concerning compliance to JMX specification of MX4J, could you
> please tel me if all the security checks on the MBeanServer are
> currently implemented.
> For example, is permission checking for getDomains() implemented ?

Yes, the security part is fully implemented, for both JSR 3 and JSR 160.

Simon


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com