Re: Implementing new JSR 160 providers: volunteers ?

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> In particular, I"d like to develop providers for the Hessian and Burlap
>protocols from Caucho, which are released under Apache license (like
MX4J). > See http://www.caucho.com for further details.

> I guess implementing one is implementing both, with only small differences.
> The Hessian/Burlap API is very simple and yet powerful.

> Waiting for volunteers,

> Simon

It's funny that I'm working on another open source project, MyGrid (see
www.ourgrid.org) trying to put a instrumentation/management layer based on
JMX. They are using RMI for remote communication, and I was thinking it
would be great if I could use Hessian/Burlap for that, without loosing the
JSR 160 benefits (notification, monitoring).

So I guess that I'm raising my hands now. I'll take a look at the source
code for the other implementations.

Gustavo


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.