RE: Can values be negative for CounterMonitors?

Hi, 

> *However* I think the risk of breaking existing code that 
> relies on the current behaviour of JDK 5 outweighs the 
> minimal advantage of specifying 
> OBSERVED_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_ERROR.  Therefore I do not propose to 
> change the spec so that it calls for this notification.  At 
> most, we could add some text that explicitly says that the 
> behaviour is undefined for negative attributes.
> 
> Jeremy, do you have a specific problem with the different 
> behaviours of the RI and MX4J?

I think he has problems with the TCK.
I'm not sure I've understood if this is a TCK bug only or an RI and TCK bug, and what would be the best fix:
1. "Fix" MX4J
2. Fix the TCK
3. Fix the RI and TCK ?

Any suggestion ?

Thanks

Simon


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click