RE: Some code to donate

Hi, 

> >The jmxmp provider is not implemented in MX4J.
> >The main reason for that is the difficulty of finding a good SASL
> >provider; furthermore this provider is defined by the spec, 
> >meaning that
> >it must be interoperable with RI's (which involves more work).
>
> I was under the impression that jmxmp providers didn't need 
> to be able to
> communicate across different implementations, if this is not 
> the case I guess it won't be a jmxmp protocol then.

Yes, jmxmp providers must be interoperable across different
implementations.

Simon


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click