Re: RequiredModelMBean

Hi Eamonn,

Eamonn McManus wrote:

> An implementation of a JSR, such as JSR 3 (JMX API), must exactly
> respect the Java-language signatures of every class specified by that
> JSR.  It would not be legal for the MX4J implementation to add any new
> methods or change the publicly-visible inheritance of any class in the
> javax.management.* namespace.

Ok, I see your point. So instead of inheritance, I would like to ask for a delegation
model for Mx4j's RequiredModelMBean where the all method are delegated to a Mx4jModelMBean
implementation. This wouldn't affect the signature of RequiredModelMBean but has the
advantage to freely use Mx4jModelMBean within another JMX implementation.

ciao...
-- 
                                         ...roland huss
                                              consol.de



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar