RE: SOAP Namespace

Hi,

> Two things.  The first is really teeney, I prefer to use "_" 
> instead of
> ".".  Second, I think that the name should be something like
> www.mx4j.org instead of mx4j.sourceforge.net, since mx4j is really an
> entity that at the moment happens to reside at sf.net, not a business
> entity of Source Forge.
> 
> http://www.mx4j.org/remote/soap/1_0

I read somewhere that is good practice for namespaces being real resources, take for example:
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format
http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40
although they point to different resource types (a text page, an XML schema, the specification page).

Do you see any problem in having no resolution for www.mx4j.org, maybe forever (unless someone wants to buy that domain) ?

Thanks

Simon


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php