RE: JSR 160 is FINAL !
Brian Scully <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, --- "Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Ah. > I have paid attention to the names of the serialized > fields in the JSR 160 classes, but it's possible > that: > 1) I forgot to stick with the official name > 2) The name was changed between EA2 and Final > 3) The modifiers are not right (I tend to add final > to those fields that allow to be final). There was only one instance of changing modifiers that fixed the serialVersion. I think it was JMXPrincipal > Should be simpler: javadocs have both > serialVersionUID and field names/modifiers. Should > be enough to stick with the specification. Yep - the javadocs from the final spec did the trick. > I would look at the RI source as last resource. > Javadocs should be enough; if not, DON'T decompile > the classes, I repeat, DON'T decompile. No need - the javadocs got me all the way there. Thanks for the help, Brian __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/