Re: Going for BETA
Brian Scully <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, --- Carlos Quiroz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I'm very busy until next week so if somebody could > jump and take a look how to > fix the i18N bug in the XSLT processor (common.xsl) > I'd appreciate I covered the bug reported in Sourceforge, but I don't know what you mean by common.xsl. Is there another bug in the XSLT processor that isn't in the SF bug tracker? > Quoting "Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]>: > > I propose a feature freeze of MX4J in order to > focus on making the BETA1 > > release by fixing bugs and the tests cases that > fails. Is there a plan for the optional JMX remote classes to be supported in MX4J? There are quite a few (~40) tests that fail(error) every time in the optional test cases. Were these in the test cases that you were considering? Brian __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/