RE: question about Nanning
"Jon Tirsen" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:16:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.nanning.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000a01c309c4$6b4415d0$6c4a59d5@jon> |
I'd suggest starting with the test-case: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/nanning/nanning/src/test/ com/tirsen/nanning/samples/prevayler/PrevaylerTest.java?rev=1.24&content -type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Yeah, we might switch away from commons-logging, it makes things a bit too complicated and everybody just uses log4j anyway. We're in the process of switching to the new CheckpointPrevayler of Prevayler 2 which makes things much, much simpler. It will be ready for Nanning 0.3. You might like to send emails to the mailing-list: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 7:14 PM > To: Jon Tirsen > Subject: question about Nanning > > > Hi Jon, > > I am looking at Nanning and wondering what is used to bootstrap the > provided prevayler sample. I'm not finding a class with a "main" > method. Can you provide any hints here? Is there some documentation I > missed? > > Also, why use commons-logging instead of log4j directly? IMHO, > commons-logging is a buggy hack and a significant number of the problems > reported with logging issues on the log4j-user list have to do with > commons-logging messing things up, almost never Log4j itself. I suggest > reading http://www.qos.ch/logging/thinkAgain.html . Also, you might want > to update to the latest Log4j-1.2.8. > > thanks, > > Jake ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf