[nanocontainer-scm] [jira] Updated: (NANO-106) NanoNamingImpl should fail if constructed with illegal arguments

The following issue has been updated:

    Updater: Philipp Meier (mailto:meier-cWh1PtA/[email protected])
       Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:56 AM
    Comment:
Path attached
    Changes:
             Attachment changed to naming-check-construction.patch
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
For a full history of the issue, see:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-106?page=history

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-106

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: NANO-106
    Summary: NanoNamingImpl should fail if constructed with illegal arguments
       Type: Improvement

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Major

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: NanoContainer
 Components: 
             remoting
   Versions:
             1.0

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Philipp Meier

    Created: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:55 AM
    Updated: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:56 AM

Description:
The Constructor of NanoNamingImpl doesn't check if any of the arguments are null. It should fail if any of them is null, according to the principle "fail fast" and because this leads to hard to track NPEs later on.

Path will be attached.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira