[nanocontainer-scm] [jira] Commented: (NANO-97) nano-persistence

The following comment has been added to this issue:

     Author: Thomas Heller
    Created: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 3:48 PM
       Body:
IMHO ThreadLocal is fine as long as done right. They buy you complete transparency and you don't need to worry about complex hierachies. Some things get alot easier with ThreadLocals (eg. Transactions).

Just have them package-private,protected (eg. non-public) and take big care when/how you use them. Usually you should be the one creating the threadlocal and you should be the one disposing it never let the user even see it. try/finally is a must.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-97?page=comments#action_25262

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/NANO-97

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: NANO-97
    Summary: nano-persistence
       Type: New Feature

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Major

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: NanoContainer

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Philipp Meier

    Created: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 1:14 PM
    Updated: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 3:48 PM

Description:
Stephen Molitor intially suggestest this module on the pico-dev-list. I  file this issue to have a place to attach my contribution of code. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira