[jira] Commented: (NANO-69) support for avalon components
jira-yCVjj/[email protected] Tue, 4 May 2004 15:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.nanocontainer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Leo Simons
Created: Tue, 4 May 2004 3:04 PM
Body:
in summary: name is not important enough to waste bandwidth on.
Joerg wrote:
> May I add this?
I'd like to do that, actually :-D
> Please assign me ... though I would not use type1, since we exchanged in all our docs the "type X" definition and even renamed CICA and SICA accordingly.
What's in a name? You think this matters a lot? I think its more important to us (developers) we understand what it means than to the average user (who should be isolated from most terminology anyway).
The nice thing about Fowler's article is that it has this descriptive name for dependency injection, namely dependency injection. No such thing for the old patterns. Something similar for avalon might be dependency provision, but that is too generic (injection is provision), and also not quite fitting, since avalon also splits out the lifecycle into many small pieces.
Until someone figures out a generic term for "type 1" IoC that is still unique enough so it is clear that this is about IoC, I think we're stuck with it.
> So what about picalon?
I don't like having lots of names all that much. I think its a lot more confusing than having just 1 or 2. But, no biggie, if you think a non-descriptive name is better, I can go and change the package names again :/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=NANO-69&page=comments#action_19363
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=NANO-69
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: NANO-69
Summary: support for avalon components
Type: New Feature
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Major
Original Estimate: 1 day
Time Spent: Unknown
Remaining: 1 day
Project: NanoContainer
Assignee:
Reporter: Leo Simons
Created: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 9:42 AM
Updated: Tue, 4 May 2004 3:04 PM
Description:
It would be nice if Avalon-Framework-compatible components could run inside a PicoContainer unmodified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira