Re: Proposal for component parameters handling in XML

Konstantin Priblouda wrote:

>--- Jon Tirsén <jon_tirsen-/[email protected]> wrote:
>  
>
>>Nah, remove the type information from both parameter
>>and dependency. They are provided by the reflection
>>API so there's no need to specify them in two
>>places.
>>In fact, it could even cause problems.
>>    
>>
>
>Parameter is constant parameter. Which is not only
>string - ConstantParameter needs object, and you need
>to 
>know what class you are instantiating....
>  
>

Yup, and you know that by reflecting on the class of the component. 
Hmm... could be a bit complicated to implement, I see...

>And ComponentParameter needs either class, or object -
>
>object got to be instantiated somehow...
>  
>

Class or object? When you are building a container using XML all keys 
are strings, so the key is always a string, no need to arse.