Re: Will "Performance" (and stability) sometime appear in NetBeans roadmap?
geertjan wielenga <[email protected]> Fri, 09 Dec 2016 19:21:44 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Oracle Corporation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Motivations re NetBeans at Apache are clearly described: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal Gj On 9-12-2016 11:29, NukemBy wrote: > Martin, thanks for you comment - I've really learned something new, especially regarding moving to Apache > > > Martin Balin wrote: >> 8.2.1 means NetBeans 8.2 Patch 1. ... http://wiki.netbeans.org/NetBeansPatchesProcess > To sum up, as far as I understand, there are no special 'roadmap' notes for patch releases. That's OK since i've got that link. It would be nice to also have it visible somewhere at https://netbeans.org/community/releases/roadmap.html, to void misunderstandings. > > > Martin Balin wrote: >> NetBeans 9 charter is to support JDK9 feature namely modules and JavaShell. > I have got same filling when looking in HG repo, but did not see in 'official' sources ... > > > Martin Balin wrote: >> And in the meantime donation to Apache will happen. > Just curious - if Oracle is tired of sponsorship over NetBeans? Not sure if moving to Apache will be better for NetBeans. (For sure this will slow-down actual development for some period) > > I've looked through discussion at apache and not sure how NetBeans without nb-javac will work because it, as far as I understand, is used for supporting of intellisense in Java Editor. > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2fe2a31ad9ab690184811a7567c0bedf9ffdab39b5219c04584a440a@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E >> We -- i.e., both on Oracle and Apache sides -- want to be very clear about what exactly, of the large repo and various bits and pieces -- we're donating. There are clearly parts we do not want to donate, etc, e.g., the Java compiler fork, for example. > > > >