Re: Teaching with NetBeans
"spurdyne" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:17:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.education |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Do let the rest of us know what you two come up with. From some of the nbuser emails I've seen, it looks like there's a great need for a Newbie Edition, or at least an easy way to build one. Vaughn Spurlin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Boudreau" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:57 AM Subject: Re: [nbedu] Teaching with NetBeans > Ray Tayek wrote: > > > At 11:41 AM 6/12/03 -0400, you wrote: > > > >> ... > >> NetBeans gives me the opportunity to maybe offer the students > >> something they can move too when they have "graduated" out of BlueJ. > >> We still have a lot of work to do to integrate BlueJ into the course > >> but a few students have said they really like it and many have stuck > >> with it. > > > > > > consider starting with net beans instead. ignore the project tab. put > > the code in a package using the default project. and just hit f9 and > > f6. for tje second project, use the project manager to create it. but > > again ignore the project tab (i.e. just use the filesystem tab). and > > hit f6 and f9 a lot. > > One option is to turn off the Projects module - that will get rid of the > projects tab entirely. > > Of course, you probably don't want your students to have to > configure NetBeans, just use it. There are two options: > > - Preconfigure a shared version on a drive that's shared with > all the student workstations. After installation, delete > projects.jar from the modules directory (you may want > to turn off other modules to simplify the experience for > your students) > - Do a custom build with only the modules you want and > have your students download that from some shared location > > I've long thought we should do a NetBeans "education build" > preconfigured with fewer bells and whistles. You can get > close to tha by doing a build with ant -Dmoduleconfig=slim, > but you still have, for example, projects. If we could agree > on what needs to be in it, I'd be willing to make the build > for you (off the 3.5 release trunk or whatever) and send > it your way. Longer term, > I think this should be downloadable on the web site; that > requires a bunch of work from the folks maintaining the > web site and build process to get automated "edu build" > versions posted. In the short term, it's fairly simple to > add build targets to the build script. > > Does any of this sound interesting? > > -Tim >