Re: Status or future of Woodstock in Netbeans
John Jullion-Ceccarelli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi folks, First off, thanks to Robert for bringing this to a head, it was high time we got an open discussion about this going. I've posted some more info on Woodstock on nbusers: http://forums.netbeans.org/viewtopic.php?t=4081 Rather than duplicate the conversation here, let's just move it over to nbusers. Thanks, -J Robert Hook wrote: > I am fairly certain that at least some of the responses I will receive > to the following will be "ask in the right forums", but as you will > read, asking in the right forums is like shouting into an empty bucket. > > Can anyone tell me, and others, what the future - long, short and > immediate - for Project Woodstock is in Netbeans? As it stands at the > moment, you can see that people are crying out in the forums > > https://woodstock.dev.java.net/servlets/ForumMessageList?forumID=2879 > > and in the mailing list > > https://woodstock.dev.java.net/servlets/BrowseList?listName=users&by=date&from=2008-10-01&to=2008-10-31&first=1&count=57 > > asking the same thing, with zero response. > > I have made the possibly fatal mistake of committing a large project to > using Netbeans, Visual JSF, and Woodstock, and after considerable work, > when I hit a bug, have found that there is zero support available anywhere. > > That takes me to a meta-gripe, which I'm hoping someone can actually > throw some light on. The netbeans wiki > (http://wiki.netbeans.org/FaqChat) advises several chat forums. I've > been crying into those forums for several weeks, and have never received > any answer - if they are not in some wise an 'official' channel, could > the wiki be updated to reflect the *real* place to direct questions like > this? > > I really, really want Netbeans to be successful, it is far and away the > best IDE for java development I've used, but if this continued complete > inability to find any meaningful support continues, I'm going to have to > re-evaluate and probably take my dev team back to a commercial product. >