Re: Status or future of Woodstock in Netbeans

John Jullion-Ceccarelli <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi folks,

First off, thanks to Robert for bringing this to a head, it was high 
time we got an open discussion about this going. I've posted some more 
info on Woodstock on nbusers:

http://forums.netbeans.org/viewtopic.php?t=4081

Rather than duplicate the conversation here, let's just move it over to 
nbusers.

Thanks,

-J

Robert Hook wrote:
> I am fairly certain that at least some of the responses I will receive
> to the following will be "ask in the right forums", but as you will
> read, asking in the right forums is like shouting into an empty bucket.
>
> Can anyone tell me, and others, what the future - long, short and
> immediate - for Project Woodstock is in Netbeans? As it stands at the
> moment, you can see that people are crying out in the forums
>
> https://woodstock.dev.java.net/servlets/ForumMessageList?forumID=2879
>
> and in the mailing list
>
> https://woodstock.dev.java.net/servlets/BrowseList?listName=users&by=date&from=2008-10-01&to=2008-10-31&first=1&count=57
>
> asking the same thing, with zero response.
>
> I have made the possibly fatal mistake of committing a large project to
> using Netbeans, Visual JSF, and Woodstock, and after considerable work,
> when I hit a bug, have found that there is zero support available anywhere.
>
> That takes me to a meta-gripe, which I'm hoping someone can actually
> throw some light on. The netbeans wiki
> (http://wiki.netbeans.org/FaqChat) advises several chat forums. I've
> been crying into those forums for several weeks, and have never received
> any answer - if they are not in some wise an 'official' channel, could
> the wiki be updated to reflect the *real* place to direct questions like
> this?
>
> I really, really want Netbeans to be successful, it is far and away the
> best IDE for java development I've used, but if this continued complete
> inability to find any meaningful support continues, I'm going to have to
> re-evaluate and probably take my dev team back to a commercial product.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.