Re: Making NetBeans' Mercurial More Manageable
Daniel Bell <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:01:25 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAE0EVaVWFteYLv7ZAxyo7RMAms_n6wJ9FUuEK6TmZhtK_rZyQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Re the Subversion mirror, this ( http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/BITBUCKET/Accessing+your+Bitbucket+Repository+via+Subversion) might be worth keeping an eye on. On 4 November 2011 08:28, Tom Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you so much, Jesse, for your thoughtful and informed response. > You make a lot of good points and I'd be surprised if there's anyone > who knows more -- or has thought more -- about this topic than you. > > One particularly noteworthy point is that having an alternate, > simplified process might encourage casual contributions without any > real burden for the full-time developers working on NetBeans. > Although having to download a ~ 3GB hg repo can be a barrier to a > casual contributor, it works out nicely that most of this is > historical information not really needed for simple changes. > Likewise, direct push (or commit, in the case of svn) access isn't > needed for simple changes either. > > While even simple contributions can be very valuable, I think that > encouraging simple contributions now will likely pay off in more > significant contributions later as contributors gain experience. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Jesse Glick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ... > > An easy action would be to publish a read-only Subversion mirror from > which > > you could check out and update a subset of sources. > > ... > -- > Tom Wheeler > http://www.tomwheeler.com/ >