Re: Proposal for extending the election term for the NetBeans Governance Board
Florian Vogler <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:04:27 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHE00ZW9=7hgbhT8dzB09eTj5r+4-YMfjwtt1VXdJQ7c_yvdUw@mail.gmail.com> |
I agree as well. Very often the problem to get things done is not the intent to do it, it's the lack of time. Florian Am 15. März 2012 08:42 schrieb Emilian Bold <[email protected]>: > I agree. 6 months gives you too little time to actually pursue something. > --emi > > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Sven Reimers <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> the NetBeans Governance Board is starting the process for the election >> of the next Board. >> >> As part of this process I would like to propose the following change >> to the actual rules: >> - Extension of the term from now 6 months to 12 months, starting with >> the new elected Board in about 2 months. >> >> Reasoning: >> After serving for nearly two terms on the Board and after discussions >> in last term with Tom and this term with Zoran, we decided that having >> a 12 months >> term helps to get things done. If you are new to the Board you will >> probably try to get some idea about Open Source, processes, community >> or similar going. >> With now monthly conference calls you end up with a long turn around >> time (which you need, if you want Oracle buy in) until you get things >> moving. >> >> To give you an idea, let me give you an example. Starting new elected, >> in the first call you establish the meeting procedure and other formal >> stuff, maybe you state your ideas for you term. With the second call >> you are getting into more details, trying to get some answers and >> coordinate the effort. Now add 2 to 3 iterations and you are already >> nearing the end of your term, before you can make sure that your >> proposed changes will take place. If now a new board is elected - who >> pursues your ideas and makes sure things really get done? >> >> Based on this experience I propose the extension of the term to 12 months. >> >> Based on your feedback the acting Governance Board will extend / not >> extend the term for the next Board. >> >> Let the discussion begin! >> >> -Sven >> >> -- >> Sven Reimers >> >> * Senior Expert Software Architecture >> * NetBeans Dream Team Member: http://dreamteam.netbeans.org >> * NetBeans Governance Board Member: >> http://netbeans.org/about/os/governance.html >> * Community Leader NetBeans: http://community.java.net/netbeans >> Desktop Java: >> http://community.java.net/javadesktop >> * Duke's Choice Award Winner 2009 >> * Blog: http://nbguru.blogspot.com >> >> * XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Sven_Reimers8 >> * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/svenreimers >> >> Join the NetBeans Groups: >> * XING: http://www.xing.com/group-20148.82db20 >> * NUGM: http://haug-server.dyndns.org/display/NUGM/Home >> * LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1860468 >> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=107402 >> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1684717 >> * Oracle: https://mix.oracle.com/groups/18497 > > > > > -- > http://www.josekibold.ro : Honesty & well-done software. -- Software Engineer and Developer NetBeans Dream Team Member and Contributor http://wiki.netbeans.org/wiki/view/NetBeansDreamTeam http://www.netbeans.org