Re: Research on NetBeans contribution practises @UnivHelsinkiCS

Just FYI, I for one already responded to Hanna's different set of=20
questions prepared for open source project community managers in October=20
last year and asked for the overall results once available. So far Hanna=20
already shared partial results with me so I assume that when she will be=20
done with this particular survey she will be same polite and send us the=20
outcome of her study.

-Jirka

Dne 31.1.2017 v 17:08 Emilian Bold napsal(a):

> I see this as a branch of anthropology.
>
> NetBeans has been very kind and responded to such inquires throughout
> the years and in turn we traditionally get such requests.
>
> I don't believe we learned much from this, we just gained goodwill in
> some academic niche.
>
> --emi
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Wade Chandler <[email protected]=
m
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     What is the hypothesis? If not testing one, then what is the goal
>     and reasoning of your research? It is generally good etiquette to
>     present some open reasoning for participation in such a survey.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Wade
>
>
>
>>     On Jan 31, 2017, at 02:26, geertjan wielenga
>>     <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     So your report will be out of date when you publish it? I
>>     recommend you go with the way NetBeans will be when you publish
>>     the report, i.e., an Apache project, which means "2 Open for any
>>     accredited individual" for all the categories.
>>
>>     Gj
>>
>>     On 31-1-2017 7:46, Hanna M=C3=A4enp=C3=A4=C3=A4 wrote:
>>>     Hi Gj,
>>>     Thanks for the reply, what you said is actually very interesting.
>>>     Aim of our research case will then be to record the state of
>>>     affairs before the transformation.
>>>
>>>     Could somebody help me with the questions please?
>>>
>>>     Kindly,
>>>     Hanna
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 22:18, geertjan wielenga
>>>     <[email protected]>
>>>     <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         NetBeans is currently moving to Apache and all the Apache
>>>         rules and processes will apply to it.
>>>
>>>         Gj
>>>
>>>         On 30-1-2017 17:03, "M=C3=A4enp=C3=A4=C3=A4 , Hanna M K" wrot=
e:
>>>>         Dear recipients,
>>>>         I am currently doing research on governance practises of
>>>>         Eclipse, Netbeans, Qt and GTK+ projects. So far my team has
>>>>         observed online documents in search of policies and
>>>>         guidelines. However,  using several viewpoints would
>>>>         increase validity of our results.
>>>>
>>>>         We would greatly appreciate if somebody from within the
>>>>         developer organisation could contribute to our case study by
>>>>         answering the following questions:
>>>>
>>>>         A Who can contribute to software code?
>>>>         B Who can accept code contributions?
>>>>         C Who can impact prioritization of work requests?
>>>>         D Who can verify defect reports?
>>>>         E Who can test code contributions?
>>>>
>>>>         F Who knows about the integration process of code contributi=
ons?
>>>>         G Who knows what is on the product roadmap?
>>>>         H Who knows timing and content of releases?
>>>>         I Who knows priorities of work issues?
>>>>
>>>>         These should be answered as:
>>>>
>>>>         0 Closed from outsiders
>>>>         1 Open for only an exclusive set of people
>>>>         2 Open for any accredited individual
>>>>         3 Open for anybody
>>>>
>>>>         I greatly value your contribution. Should you have any
>>>>         questions, please don=E2=80=99t hesitate to ask.
>>>>
>>>>         Kind regards,
>>>>         Hanna M=C3=A4enp=C3=A4=C3=A4
>>>>         Researcher, Doctoral Student
>>>>         University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science (Home
>>>>         of Linux).
>>>>
>>>>         hannakala@Skype
>>>>         https://www.linkedin.com/in/hannakala
>>>>         <https://www.linkedin.com/in/hannakala>
>>>
>>
>
>