RE: Caching problems
"Ojares Rami EINT" <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:37:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.javacvs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you Martin for the answer. By the way, I have not following netbeans (because I use jEdit). I understand that javacvs is a sub project of netbeans and lately you (Martin) have been telling about the future relations of javacvs and other netbeans components. I did not quite understand what was going on. My concern is whether javacvs will maintain it's independence. It has not been very separate (website & cvs hidden somewhere in netbeans). So I would like to know how independent is the planned future of javacvs. - rami >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 6:22 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [javacvs-dev] Caching problems > > >Well, my impression is, that one connection should be used just for one >command. This is why there is implemented a warning in the >library. This looks >like a limitation of the cvs server that it needs an extra >connection for every >command. > >It should not be possible to get the contents of deleted >files. But perhaps >there is some staled information about these files from the >status command, so >perhaps the server is confused. > >-Martin > >Ojares Rami EINT wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There seems to be some internal caching going on under the hood. >> >> I want to do the following: >> >> - find all the files that NEEDS_MERGE with status command >> - Delete those files. >> - Do a normal update >> >> When I use the same client object to execute both of those >> commands instead of doing a normal update for the deleted >> files from server to local javacvs reports a conflict >> as if the files were not deleted at all. >> >> Javacvs behaves normally only if I use separate clients >> that have separate connection objects. >> >> Reusing the same AdminHandler does not have any effect >> (which would be to me more understandable) but it seems >> the contents of the deleted files seem to be cached/related >> to the connection used. >> >> Could someone point me where does the update get the contents >> of the deleted file because I can not find it. >> >> - rami ojares >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >