Re: Re: [nbdev] Please make build system more intuitive

Martin Matula <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Sep 2002 09:49:13 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.mdr.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hm. That's strange.
I will look at it. Thanks,
Martin

Brian Smith wrote:
> Indeed, he emailed me to say that the dependency problem went away.
> 
> But he mentioned the following exception occurred (maybe it is the 
> standard "storage doesn't exist yet, will create it now" exception)?
> 
> Annotation: Exception occurred in Request Processor
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Missing mandatory property:
> org.netbeans.mdr.persistence.btreeimpl.filename
>         at
> org.netbeans.mdr.persistence.btreeimpl.btreestorage.BtreeFactory.createStora 
> 
> ge(BtreeFactory.java:31)
>         at
> org.netbeans.mdr.storagemodel.MdrStorage.<init>(MdrStorage.java:249)
>         at
> org.netbeans.mdr.NBMDRepositoryImpl.initCheck(NBMDRepositoryImpl.java:452)
>         at
> org.netbeans.mdr.NBMDRepositoryImpl.getExtent(NBMDRepositoryImpl.java:206)
>         at
> org.netbeans.modules.mdrxml.MDRXMLModule.installXML(MDRXMLModule.java:77)
>         at
> org.netbeans.modules.mdrxml.MDRXMLModule$1.run(MDRXMLModule.java:49)
>         at org.openide.util.Task.run(Task.java:136)
> [catch] at
> org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Processor.run(RequestProcessor.java:599)
> 
> 
> 
> Martin Matula wrote:
> 
>> I think that Andrew had problem with MDR before the JMI interfaces 
>> were put on Autoupdate. At that time you had to build the JMI 
>> interfaces and install them yourself (because of legal issues) and 
>> after that install the MDR modules from autoupdate. This was explained 
>> on our http://mdr.netbeans.org/installation.html page, but many people 
>> did not know that and thus had problems. The problem is solved as 
>> finally we were able to release also JMI interfaces.
>> Martin
>>
>> Brian Smith wrote:
>>
>>> [Moved to MDR-DEV}
>>>
>>> I never tried MDR from autoupdate since I always am using CVS builds 
>>> of everything. But, I think that the MDR team expects that the MDR 
>>> modules from autoupdate to be usable. Could you explain your problem 
>>> in more detail? Is it the Looks API by chance?
>>>
>>> Andrew Chandler wrote:
>>>
>>>> Considering I've managed to totally mess up my install twice when 
>>>> trying to
>>>> deal with MDR I'm probably the wrong person to ask :-0
>>>> My main problme I guess is that until now I've tried to use the 
>>>> pre-built
>>>> stuff for my day to day and only build those things I thought I 
>>>> absolutely
>>>> had to - MDR is one of those because despite the modules being 
>>>> available for
>>>> download there is a dependency (or was about a month ago) that you 
>>>> can't get
>>>> from the auto update and have to instead build.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>