Re: RE : [mdr-dev] RE : [mdr-dev] RE : [Fwd: Re: [mdr-dev] JDBC persistence]

Olivier RICHAUD wrote:
> I think it could make sense. Let suppose we modify MDR's state because we
> have create a new objet. This may correspond to an application state which
> must persistent. Both states must committed together : the transaction is a
> multi-database transaction. In this case, Jboss transaction manager will
> ensure atomicity and soundness.

Right.  This is possible, but it requires more than just a JDBC storage 
implementation, because MDR maintains additional transactional state 
outside of the storage subsystem.  So all levels of MDR would need to 
participate in the distributed transaction.

JVS