Re: Internal storage of nodes
Martin Matula <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:04:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.mdr.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brian, please remove org-netbeans-modules-mdr.jar, openide-fs.jar and openide-loaders.jar. Then it should work. Also instead of openide.jar you can use just openide-util.jar which is smaller. But openide.jar is fine too. Martin Brian Topping wrote: >Hi Martin, thanks for the input. > >I had a nosebleed idea to start using the 4.0 source instead of the 3.x, but >I'm having problems getting the minimum set of libraries together for >standalone mode. The FAQ looks like the set required for 3.x, and I've been >playing around for hours trying to scrape the 4.0 build for stuff that might >work. It looks like it is mostly loading, but the root FS looks empty and >there's nothing named 'MDRepositories' registered there. > >My current list of jars are as follows: > >jmi.jar >jmiutils.jar >mdr.jar >mof.jar >notnow >openide-fs.jar >openide-loaders.jar >openide.jar >org-netbeans-api-mdr.jar >org-netbeans-modules-mdr.jar > >The first line of code that I am executing is throwing an NPE in >getDefaultRepository(): > > MDRepository repository = MDRManager.getDefault().getDefaultRepository(); > >Any ideas on what I am missing? > >thanks! > >-b > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Martin Matula [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:56 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [mdr-dev] Internal storage of nodes >> >> >>Brian, >>if you are using repository in a usual way (with >>memory/b-tree storage), >>DeferredObjects should never be used, externalObjects should >>always be >>null, so getExternal should take no time. All the objects in >>the storage >>are subclasses of StorableBaseObject. MdrStorage.getObject() reads >>object from the storage based on its MOFID. >>refAllOfType call delegates to StorableClass.allObjects(true), which >>creates a lazy collection over a storage index (we store a separate >>index in the storage that maps a class to all of its instances). >>Hopefuly this helps. I am still not sure if I understand what exactly >>you need. >>Martin >> >>Brian Topping wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi Martin, >>> >>>I'd like to use this in a tool that I have already built >>> >>> >>that uses the >> >> >>>MDRepository interface. The storage would would be >>> >>> >>transient memory storage >> >> >>>only. >>> >>>In the end, my primary goal is not really a focus on the >>> >>> >>storage, but an >> >> >>>effort to get to the source of where nodes come from in an >>> >>> >>extant model, such >> >> >>>as when a collection is returned from a refAllOfType call. >>> >>> >>It seems like >> >> >>>these collections always go through getExternal, but I >>> >>> >>realize I might be >> >> >>>looking in the very wrong place for things ;-) >>> >>>Thanks! >>> >>>Brian >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Martin Matula [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:55 PM >>>>To: [email protected] >>>>Subject: Re: [mdr-dev] Internal storage of nodes >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi Brian, >>>>in what context do you want to measure this? Are you using MDR as a >>>>standalone tool or do you refer to its usage in JavaCore module? >>>>Martin >>>> >>>>Brian Topping wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi list, >>>>> >>>>>I'm experimenting with some code in NBR and was wondering if >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I could confirm >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>some of my findings or get some alternate suggestions. >>>>> >>>>>I'm trying to find bottleneck points in the code for objects >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>in a repository. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>I'd like to add some experimental code to audit them as they >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>go in or out of >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>storage. It seems like persistent storage of objects is all >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>done by mofID >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>via DeferredObjects, is that so? Then it seems that >>>>>registerExternal/removeExternal/getExternal in MdrStorage >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>are going to be >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>bottlenecks, that I should be able to audit everything that >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>is created or >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>read from there. >>>>> >>>>>If this isn't the case, is there some minimal set of points >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>that I can >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>intercept where objects in the repository are sent after >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>they are created? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Thanks! >>>>> >>>>>Brian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >