Re: [mdr-users] Borland Together, CWM, UML2MOF
"John V. Sichi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.mdr.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Mike, We extend CWM as the DBMS catalog model for the Farrago project (http://farrago.sourceforge.net). We have some Rube Goldberg XSL that allows us to reference CWM from our extension model without dragging CWM into the UML modeling tool (currently Poseidon). An example script can be viewed here: http://p4web.eigenbase.org/open/dev/farrago/catalog/xmi/resolveCwmRefs.xsl In our extension model, there's a package named CwmRef. In it, we create dummy classes with names matching real CWM class names. When we want to reference a CWM class, we reference the dummy class instead. To combine our extension model with CWM, we use this script to resolve the references and delete the dummy packages. JVS >> Subject: >> RE: [mdr-users] Borland Together, CWM, UML2MOF >> From: >> "Mike Martin" <[email protected]> >> Date: >> Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:47:20 -0500 >> To: >> <[email protected]> >> >>Is Together going to be more trouble than it's worth? Is there >>a better tool that folks prefer? The thing is, I assume I need >>something that can open the CWM UML in order to design a package >>that extends from it. Or is there some other more clever way of >>referencing CWM objects without them actually being in the UML >>I'm working on? >> >>All advice appreciated. >> >>Mike