Re: Changes in the JavaPlatform API

Vitezslav Stejskal wrote:
> 
> 
> Tomas Zezula wrote:
> 
>>>> The question is what to put into base EditionType, according to me 
>>>> it should have at least SE type.
>>>>
> Wouldn't it be enough to use String identification of the platform 

IMHO, what Tomas proposed is more type-safe.

> instead of introducing special class which is empty anyway and serves 
> for identification purposes only. It's not clear to me who will use this 
> identification anyway - PlatformService implementations, the project 
> when referencing used paltform, ...?
> 
N/A from me. I remember that Martin requested such thing.

-S.