Re: Q. aboutMutableFileSet

Vitezslav Stejskal wrote:
> I think that supressing event flow during modifications should be 
> enough. At least it seems to be enough when working with FileSystems, e.g.:
> 
> FS.runAtomic {
>    synchronized(xyz) {
>        FS.modify_and_fire_events();
>    }
> }
> 
> Events are fired when leaving the atomic action section which is already 
> outside the synchronization.
> 
Please look at Mutex class and its evolution - first there were only 
methods with Runnables - but because of its frequent use (and many inner 
anonymous classes created), paired enter/exit methods were added later.
It's not so safe for the API caller, but it is more effective for IDE's 
footprint (and execution time, too ;))

-Svata