Project scheduling

Hello everybody ;)

I read Tor's "proposal" for the scheduler, and I have some comments...

I would like to go for the solution where we "pollute" the UserTask class
with all of the project information. I would even go so far that I would
allow the user to add this information even if the scheduler is "missing".

What is so "bad" about giving a user the opportunity to specify start,
stop, depend upon, estimated efford, amount left etc for a task???

This would also ease the "integration" of the scheduler implementation
(I'll guess some of us would like to commit code before we have a 100%
finished scheduler, or do some of you really take backup of your
computer???)

So I would like to avoid adding a new type of task object (ScheduleTask)..

Any comments???

Trond