Re: Re: MDR for docscan

Petr Kuzel wrote:

>Hello Tim,
>
>  
>
>>Do you plan to rewrite docscan using mdr apis?
>>    
>>
>
>it'd restrict functionality on java source files only.
>Second, I'd not expect comments being primary
>use case for MDR/javacore.
>  
>
I know that it is for java only. But I think it should/could be faster 
when searching for
TODOs in a whole jar file for example and also the java parser is better.

>>How could the code for scanning java files be reused in tasklist/i18n?
>>    
>>
>
>Here, I suggest to reuse i18n module functionality. tasklist/i18n
>should be just small integration bridge with no i18n related logic.
>Created suggestion should delegate to original i18n module code.
>See javaparser, pmd, checkstyle and javadoc tasklist integration
>modules. 
>  
>
absolutely right. Tasklist shouldn't be the module for everything.

j2ee, improvements in the options dialog and suggestions are my 
favorites for nb 4.1.
I'm highly pleased with the current state of the usertasks submodule and 
will probably have time
for other things. Let me know if I could help somehow. Especially the 
dependency tl.core -> tl.api -> java
would be nice to remove.

--Tim

>Warning: javadoc contains stale copy-pasted code from javadoc module.
>It just reminds me that very original intention was to expose
>Suggestions API and let other modules integrate using it. The
>reverse model used now unfortunately requires public contract
>from relevant modules. Module owners are reluctant to provide
>it.
>
>  Cc.
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>  
>