[TF-dev] Re: Call for ideas/topics - NetBeans community translation leads call

Paul Duan - Oracle - Beijing China <[email protected]> Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:18:34 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.translated-files.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Filippo,

Coordination is always one of the great challenges for community=20
projects. When we come to translation project, it is even more=20
complicated, because we have the consistency issue to think about - I=20
believe this is an issue for every translation team, no matter they are=20
community teams or translation companies/agencies. For the later, style=20
guides/glossaries/commercial tools are used to help members to ensure=20
lexicons/translation are consistent. This may be the right direction for=20
us to follow in order to solve our problem. But we all know that's not=20
something we can finish in a day or two, having sponsors/coordinators=20
will be a major help for us to achieve those goals.

Really appreciate your sharing of your insights with us.

And good luck with your study!
Paul

On 2011=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8803=E6=97=A5 16:48, Filippo Mineo wrote:
> Hi Paul!
> I don't remember if you've ever heard from me, since I've been absent=20
> from the translation activities for a long time (at least more than a=20
> year for sure).
>
> > you have been doing all these in your spare time, in an unselfish=20
> manner, not to mention that for languages we have only a single=20
> translator, you are doing the work on your own, with no much help from=20
> others
> My situation is exactly the one you described. Unfortunately, I'm the=20
> only active Italian translator... oh well, the last who was active. I=20
> joined the NB l10n team in a period when the study wasn't as demanding=20
> as it is now.
>
> Constantin's ideas about the topics to be discussed are valid.=20
> However, he wrote:
> > Discuss about the internal teams functioning ( who is team leader ,=20
> how many contributors by team, etc)
> but in many cases there is no "internal team", since everything is=20
> taken care of by a single person.
>
> If I had to explain briefly my opinion, I'd say that the problem=20
> consists mainly in the lack of sponsors for this project. When a=20
> language has a badly coordinated team (or even no team at all), the=20
> resulting translation is consequently bad. This happens because, even=20
> assuming all individuals' work quality is high, everyone follows his=20
> own lexicon and "translation style", so that the result becomes=20
> different when the underlying translator changes.
> Of course giving such local directives is not the global team's=20
> responsibility. Anyway, returning to the main topic, many problems=20
> could be solved if contributors where more (numerically) and more=20
> coordinated, so that the project could count on a less discontinuous=20
> involvement.
>
> Although your meeting proposal is a praiseworty initiative, frankly I=20
> prefer not to take on a commitment. Meanwhile, let's hear if there are=20
> other suggestions.
>
> Hoping to get back active soon,
> arrivederci!
>
> Filippo Mineo