RE: [xml-dev] contradictory loader ordering in 3.5

> > So it goes against contract.
>=20
> Yes, though this contract is not enforced that I am aware of.
>=20
> More correct is to simply make VXMLDL.DummyDataObject extend=20
> XMLDataObject (possibly empty except for the constructor=20
> calling super)=20
> and create instances of that. Simple and compliant with the API.
>=20

I could do that, but I'd have to make xml.core.XMLDataObject not final =
:)