Re: Re: philosophical question about frequent saving of files

What makes your and anybody elses software attractive is the fact that
you did take the time, that you did manage "more stuff" so that they
did not have to.

If you tell your potential customers " well I didn't want to take the
time to save you time", they will never be impressed.

And to answer your question, " Do
we really need more technological solutions?", Yes, Yes we do.

It's like asking, "Do we really need to mature?","Do we really need to grow up?"

The difference between the world today and the world tommorow are the
Solutions WE provide, and the practical application of Skills,
Knowledge, Science, and Technology.

Please do not limit your advancement of this world becuase you want to
save time.  If you want to save money, then no one will blame you.

In the end the people who go out of their way today will be leading
the world into and through tommorow.

The choice is yours.

Respectfully,

Dan Hollingsworth
Hollingsworth Interactive
"Practical Applications of Advanced Technology."


On 8/26/05, Jesse Glick <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ivan Soleimanipour wrote:
> > In any case, isn't it the case that with SCCS/teamware (as opposed to
> > CVS) "experiment" gmgmt is easir because of the local repository?
> 
> It's also true in any VCS that makes branching and merging both fast and
> safe. E.g. when I used to use PRCS - a little-known VCS with some very
> nice features - I would just always commit to my own private branch,
> whenever I felt like it. Periodically I would then run a quick sequence
> of commands to synch up with coworkers. Similar to CVS' trunk
> update-modify-commit cycle, but with the intervening revs saved in the
> repository.
> 
> -J.
> 
> --
> [email protected]  x22801  netbeans.org  ant.apache.org
> 
>